June 21

Jur-E Bulletin: June 21, 2019

 

Judicial College Posts Results of Trial Judge Survey: Few Judges Disagree with Jury Verdicts

The National Judicial College conducts monthly surveys of judges to chart sentiments on topics of concern to state courts. The latest survey asked, “About how often do you disagree with the jury’s verdict?” The choices were:

•   Less than 25 percent of the time
•   26 to 50 percent of the time
•   51 to 75 percent of the time
•   More than 75 percent of the time

Eighty-two percent of the 446 judges who responded said they disagree less than 25 percent of the time. Further analysis is available here.

Alabama NGO Urges State to Abolish Authority for Judges to Impose Death Sentence After Non-Unanimous Jury Verdict

A few weeks ago, Alabama executed Christopher Price pursuant to a 10-2 jury verdict recommending his execution rather than life without parole. The trial judge followed the jury’s majority decision and imposed a death sentence. Noting Alabama is the only state that allows judges to sentence a person to death despite some jurors voting otherwise, the Mobile Press-Register published an op-ed that urges legislators to cure this "travesty of justice."

Batson Justifications” Training Manual Claimed to Be Evidence of North Carolina DA’s Racial Bias

In post-conviction litigation, lawyers for a death row inmate discovered a training manual that their experts say is a script for prosecutors to defeat Batson challenges and protect discriminatory strikes. The appeal process is ongoing.

When an Allen Charge Becomes Coercive

The trial judge in a South Carolina murder trial told a deadlocked jury, "you should come to a decision in this matter" and “if you're unable to come to a verdict in this matter, then, essentially, we'd be left with having to do it all over again, extending additional resources, time and effort.” The state supreme court reflected on how powerful the words of a trial judge are for jurors. It carefully compared the judge’s words with Allen charge jurisprudence in both federal and state courts and found the judge’s charge to be reversible error. Rather than properly advising them that they should attempt to come to a decision, the judge spoke in terms of obligation and cost savings. 

Occurrence of Jury Trials in Argentina Keeps Expanding

Chaco Province passed a jury trial mandate in 2015. This has special importance since Chaco's avant garde law requires an indigenous jury for those criminal cases in which both the victim and the defendant belong to the indigenous community. Earlier this month, the Judicial Branch and the Free Indigenous Section of the North East University (UNNE) held a conference on jury trials for indigenous peoples in the Capital, Resistencia. Shortly thereafter, the government announced that prospective jurors will be drawn from the lottery by August and the commencement of trial by jury is expected by October 2019.

G. Thomas Munsterman Award nominations being accepted

NCSC is accepting nominations for the G. Thomas Munsterman Award for Jury Innovation, which recognizes states, local courts, or individuals that have made significant improvements or innovations in jury procedures, operations, or practices. If you know a group or individual that meets this criteria, send in a nomination to Greg Mize. Be sure to complete and include this form with your nomination. 


Upcoming Events


Jur-E Bulletin is a publication of the Center for Jury Studies.

To subscribe at no cost, visit www.ncsc.org/newsletters.

Support the NCSC.

Notice of new or upcoming articles, projects, symposia, and other jury-related events is appreciated. We strive to have to keep the "Upcoming Events" section relevant and up to date. When alerting us to articles published elsewhere on the Web, please include the URL. We cannot reprint articles from other sources without permission, and generally only provide a link.

Disclaimer: Opinions contained herein, as well as material appearing in external sites to which this publication provides links, do not necessarily reflect those of the National Center for State Courts. Presence of any such material should not be construed as support by the National Center for State Courts or any of its associations, affiliates, or employees.

Broken Links:  Although the Editor makes an effort to ensure that links included in the newsletter are active at the time it is sent, there will be instances when readers find that links are broken or un-viewable for other reasons.  Unfortunately, this will happen occasionally.

NCSC maintains exclusive use of its subscriber lists. Information contained therein will only be used by NCSC and is never distributed to other organizations. All communications from NCSC contain an opt-out provision for your convenience.


Online research services provided by 
westlaw

 

To sign up for this or other newsletters,
visit http://www.ncsc.org/newsletters.