Nora E. Sydow
Center on Court Access to Justice for All
While instances of discrimination towards individuals of various backgrounds have dwindled, discrimination continues to threaten equality within the judicial system. Instances of bias include, but are not limited to, bias towards an individual’s gender, race and ethnicity, and sexual orientation. Through the creation of task forces, states have made strides toward eliminating bias in their court system through accomplishments such as increased access to justice, improvement in jury pool representation, promoting diversity in court appointments, providing adequate interpreter services, conducting educational programs, encouraging diversity in law enforcement, and promoting the availability of legal representation for the poor.
Links to related online resources are listed below. Non-digitized publications may
be borrowed from the NCSC Library; call numbers are provided.
This Court Executive Development Program report looks at the recommendations which have been implemented by the 1989 Supreme Court Commission on Gender Bias in the Judicial System.
A New Paradigm for Fairness: The First National Conference on Eliminating Racial and Ethnic Bias in the Courts.
This report highlights topics discussed at the 1995 First National Conference on Eliminating Racial and Ethnic Bias in the Courts such as staying vigilant against bias through continuous self-examination of court operation, fairness and equal access to justice for non-English speakers, protecting rights of American Indians, and mentoring persons of color to judicial service on the bench.
This primer was produced as part of the National Campaign to Ensure the Racial and Ethnic Fairness of America’s State Courts.
This guidebook is intended for attorneys contemplating a judicial career. It contains information on qualifications, rules and regulations, and the processes involved in seeking an appointment and in running for election to a judicial position. The guidebook also contains insight gathered from a number of judges addressing questions attorneys considering a judicial career often ask.
Article describes New Jersey's efforts to increase diversity in the courts.
(2012). This project explored the content and delivery of three pilot educational programs on implicit bias for judges and court staff. Resources from this project include: (a) the project final report, (b) a summary report on the project, (c) a brief primer on implicit bias for the court community, (d) a Frequently Asked Questions document addressing some common questions about implicit bias and summarizing what contemporary science tells us about this cognitive phenomenon, and (e) a summary of potential strategies that members of the court community may use to address implicit bias. Also provided are the materials (e.g., powerpoint slides, handouts, videos) used in each of the three pilot programs.
This report aimed to verify the representation of Hispanics in Superior Court of Orange County jury panels. The results support the recommendation that the court should consider changing its current practice of not tracking the race and ethnicity of summoned jurors.
The Justice System Journal, Vol. 29, No. 1. In response to the concerns of the Lucas County, Ohio, Court of Common Pleas that juries underrepresent African- Americans, this study evaluates the racial and Hispanic representativeness of the list of registered voters, licensed drivers and various lists derived from the original source list that leads to the list of potential jurors. The authors find that the list is more representative for African-Americans but less representative for Hispanics.
This pocket guide provides information on recognizing bias, how bias is manifested in the courtroom, eliminating bias, ensuring bias-free communication and behavior, demonstrating respect, neutrality and fairness, institutionalizing fairness, codes of conduct and bias, court or disciplinary cases involving bias, and resources.