Strategic Planning

State Links

Arizona

Commission on Technology Strategic Plans .  This webpage includes the Strategic Plan for FY 2013-2015, as well as County IT Summaries.

ICJIS: Bi-Annual Strategic Plan. Maricopa County, Arizona. Integrated Criminal Justice System Strategic Plan for FY2009 - FY2010 that promote efficient sharing of criminal justice information among criminal justice agencies.

California

Strategic Plan for Court Technology  Judicial Council of California.

Colorado

Technology Grant Application and Long-term Strategic Plan for FY 2008-2009 . Colorado Supreme Court, Court Improvement Program.

Connecticut

Phase III Implementation of the Strategic Plan . (September 2010). State of Connecticut Judicial Branch, Public Service and Trust Commission. (See section on the Technology Plan).

DC

Strategic Plan 2013-2017  . See the section on Technology.

Delaware

Technology in the Superior Court . The Superior Court of Delaware.

Federal Courts

Issue 4: Harnessing Technology’s Potential . From the 2010 Strategic Plan for the Federal Judiciary.

Long Range Plan for Information Technology in the Federal Judiciary FY2009. (2009). U.S. Courts, The Federal Judiciary The fiscal year 2010 update to the Long Range Plan for Information Technology in the Federal Judiciary articulates five-year directions and objectives for the judiciary’s information technology program.

Florida

Florida Trial Court Technology Strategic Plan: 2015-2019.  Adopted by the Florida Supreme Court.

Georgia

Georgia Courts Automation Commission . This page gives strategic technology planning reports by court level.

Illinois

Annual Report of the Automation and Technology Committee . (2008).

Strategic Plan 2003-2004. (2003). Illinois Integrated Justice Information System The Strategic Plan outlines a course of action to enable Illinois to build general systems capabilities to get the right information to the right people at the right time.

Iowa

2009 Final Report and Findings . Digital Audio/Visual Recording Technology (DART) Committee.

Maine

Maryland

Massachusetts

Montana

Nebraska

Strategic Plan 2012-2016 Nebraska Supreme Court Technology Committee The Supreme Court and the Clerk of the Supreme Court and Court of Appeals utilize an IBM i-Series mid-range system as a server for their case management system. The Supreme Court Justices and staff use leased personal computers, printers and monitors that are replaced on a three-year basis. These personal computers operate in a Windows Server 2003 Environment.

New Hampshire

Information Technology Plan SFY 2010-2013 . State of New Hampshire Judicial Branch.

New Jersey

North Carolina

Strategic Information Systems and Technology Plan 2006 - 2010. (Fall 2006). Technology Services Division, North Carolina Administrative Office of the Courts This plan represents the AOC’s current statement of direction on technology issues to be used as a starting point for all IT acquisitions or development projects.

Ohio

Technology and the Courts 2008 Survey . The Supreme Court of Ohio.

South Carolina

Strategic Technology Plan . South Carolina Judicial Department.

South Dakota

Webster, Lawrence. John Matthias, and Dale Good. Information Technology Plan. (2007). Court Services Division for South Dakota Unified Justice System. A strategic plan model for other states. For this report twenty-one state and local court IT strategic plans and related documents were examined to produce a strategic planning process and plan template that can be adapted by any court to save considerable time and money in the planning process.

Tennessee

Hellzen, Jeff. County Criminal Justice Coordinating Committee, Shelby County, TN, Technology Assistance Engagement Report. (2011). The County Criminal Justice Coordinating Committee (CCJCC) of Shelby County, Tennessee, is currently engaged in a process to purchase and deploy, via a Request for Proposal (RFP) process, a Criminal Courts Case Management System, an Offender Management System and possibly a Case Management System for the Public Defender. The County also plans to acquire the services of an independent project manager, consultant group and/or system integrator to assist them with the management and implementation of the aforementioned project(s).   This technology assistance engagement is to assist them by providing a high-level vision, plan, and supporting recommendations regarding the development and issuance of RFPs in support of their project.

Texas

 Technology Standards . (2012). Judicial Committee on Information Technology.

Utah

Utah Court Strategy Plan. (2007). Justice Council Tecchnology Committee

Washington

IT Strategy . (2009). Administrative Office of the Courts, ISD Business Planning and Governance.

2009 - 2011 Strategic Plan .(August 2008). Washington Justice information Network This plan identifies and describes the process to facilitate the integration of justice information by state and local agencies across the state of Washington.