The overcrowding and mismanagement facing the corrections systems in the U.S. today have lead to inhumane treatment of prisoners and lawsuits against correctional facilities that has created a high volume of civil-rights violation cases within our judicial system. Not only do courts have to develop a way of examining the validity and efficiency of the information used in gathering and presenting these claims, but likewise create programs that allow victim and community involvement within the criminal justice system.
Links to related online resources are listed below. Non-digitized publications may
be borrowed from the NCSC Library; call numbers are provided.
In June 2010, the U.S. Department of Justice’s Bureau of Justice Assistance sponsored a focus group of policymakers, court practitioners, parole and probation administrators, and researchers to take stock of reentry courts. This report summarizes the discussion.
This report describes the challenges women face in obtaining housing, reuniting with family, and avoiding drug use and criminal behavior after their return to the community. Recommendations for improvements in policies and practices specific to increasing the successful reintegration of women are also presented.
The purpose of this research is to evaluate the impact of the PLRA and the AEDPA. The goal was to determine the extent to which AEDPA and the PLRA have affected the number of habeas corpus petitions and prisoner lawsuits filed, respectively.
Discusses the origin and implementation of a Re-Entry Court Program in Richland County, Ohio.
This article discusses restorative justice implementation efforts.
This document explains the importance of community corrections to the cost-effective sanctioning and treatment of criminal offenders and indicates that greater cooperation between the courts and community corrections programs is needed.