Gregory Hurley
David Rottman
American Judges Association Annual Conference.
National Association of State Judicial Educators Annual Conference.
Ethics codes provide visible guidelines to clarify a court’s mission and values. They also demonstrate a court’s commitment to the fair administration of justice. Comprehensive ethics programs that include handbooks, periodic training, ethics hotlines, and procedures for anonymous reporting of misconduct strengthen a court’s response to ethical dilemmas.
Links to related online resources are listed below. Non-digitized publications may be borrowed from the NCSC Library; call numbers are provided.
Tables 5 and 6 of the Appellate Court Procedures shows a chart of the 50 states' policies on removal/impeachment of an appellate or supreme court judge.
This resource examines guidelines and restrictions regarding judicial fundraising for charitable purposes as established by the ABA Model Code. KF8779 .M351 2008
The Rules of the Code of Judicial Conduct are rules of reason that should be applied consistent with constitutional requirements, statutes, other court rules, and decisional law, and with due regard for all relevant circumstances.
This article reviews the ABA Model Code provisions pertaining to judicial stationery as well as the permitted uses of judicial stationery. (KF8779 M35 2007)
This resource provides quick reference to the Model Code of Judicial Conduct adopted by the American Bar Association, providing specific citations to the canons from the 1990 model code, followed by the parallel rule from the recently revised 2007 model code. Topics covered include judicial independence, misuse of office, courtroom demeanor, disqualification, administrative and disciplinary responsibilities, extra-judicial activities, and political and campaign activities, among others. (KF8779 G736 2009)
This issue highlights the "Call To Action" statement that came out of the Summit on Improving Judicial Selection.
This resource for judicial candidates addresses issues such as avoiding partisan political activity; becoming a candidate; political activity that is permissible; fund-raising and use of campaign funds; communicating with voters; involving friends, family and colleagues in judicial campaigning; and post-election fund-raising.
Topic areas covered in this publication include: disqualification for bias or its appearance; interest and relationship; background, experience and knowledge; judicial conduct, comments and rulings; procedure, timeliness and legal sufficiency; deciding judicial disqualification motions, disqualification in federal court; disqualification in state court; disqualification in special types of proceedings and appeal. (KF8861 .F62 2007)
The Call To Action was issued by the participants in the National Summit on Improving Judicial Selection, held on December 8-9, 2000 in Chicago, Illinois. This new edition of the Call To Action provides a commentary that introduces the four sections of the Call To Action and provides background on the 20 recommendations.
This presentation was given at the National College of Probate Judges' 2002 Fall Conference. It discusses the ABA Model Canons and raises questions on judge's participation in volunteer work, fundraising activities, and educational programs funded by businesses, foundations or other non-governmental entities.
This publication covers confidentiality, conflicts of interest, outside legal activities, dealings with prospective employers, outside professional, social and community activities, and receipt of gifts and honoraria. It also provides an ethics checklist for federal judicial law clerks.
The annotations supply references from case law and other resources. This volume also contains correlation tables to facilitate reference to the ABA Model Code of Professional Responsibility. (KF305 .A2 2003)
This Web site outlines the Wisconsin code and provides commentary. Topics include: accuracy and completeness, representation of qualifications, impartiality and avoidance of conflict of interest, professional demeanor, confidentiality, restriction on public comment, scope of practice, assessing and reporting of impediments to performance, duty to report ethical violations, and professional development.
The Model Code is presented in Chapter 9 of Court Interpretation: Model Guides for Interpretation and Practice in the State Courts.