Search
advanced
MY CENTER LOGIN
not registered?
forgot your password?
Follow NCSC:
May 23, 2012
Newsroom
Publications
About Us
Contact
Donate
Information & Resources
Browse Topics A-Z
Browse by Category
Browse by State
Court Web Sites
State of the Judiciary Message archive
Court Statistics Project
Budget Resource Center
State activities map
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
District of Columbia
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Economic Impact on the Courts
Economic Impact on the Courts
Fines and fees
State of the Judiciary Quotes Related to Budgetary Issues
Comparing state courts
High Performance Courts
Social media
Services & Experts
Areas of expertise
Appellate Justice
Budgeting & Financial Administration
Caseflow & Workflow management
Children, Families & Elders
VAWA Courts Assistance
Civil justice
Civil Justice Survey
Data
Publications listing CJS data
More online
Court statistics
Emergency preparedness & Court security
Facilities planning
Courthouse Retrospective 2001-2010
Human resources
Jury management
Organizational management
Performance measurement
Problem solving courts
Funding for drug courts
MHC Performance Measures
Sentencing & Probation
Technology
2009 E-filing Survey
2011 Technology Survey Results
NCSC Video Conferencing Survey
Trust & accountability
Separate Branches, Shared Responsibilities:
Workload assessment
Court leadership
Harvard Executive Session
4th Symposium
Court reengineering
Principles
Kansas
Minnesota
Nebraska
New Hampshire
New Mexico
Oregon
Vermont
Processes
Government Relations
Access to Justice
Court Interpreter Legislation
Limited English Proficiency
Child Welfare
CAPTA Reauthorization
Children and Family Services Reviews
Interstate Compact for the Placement of Children
ICPC Point of Contact List
Restructuring of Child Welfare Funding
Fostering Connections to Success Act
Child Support Enforcement
Incentives
UIFSA Proposed Revisions
Corrections
Reentry Policy
Court Security
Court Security
Homeland Security
Criminal-Adult
Limitations on Federal Review of State Criminal Convictions
Justice Integrity Act of 2008
Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act
Mentally Ill Offender Treatment and Crime Reduction Act
Domestic Violence
Improving Assistance to Domestic and Sexual Violence Victims Act of 2009
Drug Courts
Drug courts substance abuse and mental health
Federal Funding
Commerce Justice Science Appropriations
Justice Assistance Grant Program
Labor HHS Education Appropriations
Legal Services Corporation Appropriations
Mental Health Courts Appropriations
State Justice Institute Appropriations
Federalism
Tort Reform
Interstate Recognition of Notarization Act
Guardianship & Elder Care
Elder Abuse
Uniform Adult Guardianship and Protective Proceedings Jurisdiction Act
International
Free Trade Agreements
General Agreement on Trade Services
Hague Convention on Choice of Courts
Juvenile Justice
Interstate Compact for Juveniles
Gang Prevention and Deterrence Legislation
Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act
Privacy and Access
Protection of Social Security Numbers
Information Services Technology
NICS Improvement Amendments Act of 2007
Miscellaneous
Offset of Federal Tax Returns to Collect Fines Fees and Restitution
Prosecutors and Defenders Incentive Act
Compensation for Federal Judges
Justice Case Files
Technology tools
National standards
Court-specific standards
Court Technology Bulletin
Technology vendors
Technology topics
Technology staff
Education & Careers
Courses
Course Calendar
CMP Licensee Program
Subscriptions
Partnerships
Free Resources
Contact ICM Staff
Vice President of ICM
ICM History
ICM-Certifications
Certification Programs
Court Management Program
Program Overview - CMP
Admission - CMP
ICM Certification Model
ICM Fellows Program
Program Overview - ICM Fellows Program
Admission - ICM Fellows Program
ICM Fellows
Gallery Years
ICM Fellows Directory
The ICM Fellow Star Award
Arthurine Criswell, ICM Fellows Program Spokesperson 2012
ICM Fellows Papers
2012 ICM Fellows Papers
2011 ICM Fellows Papers
2010 ICM Fellows Papers
2009 ICM Fellows Papers
2008 ICM Fellows Papers
2007 ICM Fellows Papers
2006 ICM Fellows Papers
2005 ICM Fellows Papers
2004 ICM Fellows Papers
2003 ICM Fellows Papers
2002 ICM Fellows Papers
2001 ICM Fellows Papers
2000 ICM Fellows Papers
Production Services
Online Course Development
Video Production
Interactive Multimedia
State Interpreter Certification
Resources for Interpreter Program Managers
Contact Persons by State
Testing schedules by state
Examinations
Compensation and salaries of Court Interpreters
Court interpreter events / workshops
Federal Interpreter Certification
Jobs
Court Community Jobs
Jobs@NCSC
How to Post
Conferences & Events
CTC 2011
eCourts 2012
Events Calendar
NCSC International
NCSC
>
Information & Resources
>
Budget Resource Center
>
State activities map
> Oklahoma
Share
Browse Topics A-Z
Browse by Category
Browse by State
Court Statistics Project
Budget Resource Center
-
State activities map
-
Economic Impact on the Courts
-
Fines and fees
-
State of the Judiciary Quotes Related to Budgetary Issues
Comparing state courts
High Performance Courts
Social media
Oklahoma
Overview
Oklahoma's court system is primarily state funded. The state pays the salaries of the trial court and appellate judges and their staff. District court clerks and their staff are county employees; however, some deputy court clerks are paid out of local court funds.
Oklahoma’s appropriation was increased from $95.4 million in FY11 to $99 million in FY12. They will be able to maintain the same number of judges and staff and will be able to increase the amount spent on operating costs.
To reduce spending, the Oklahoma courts have delayed filling judicial vacancies, and delayed filling vacancies in the clerk’s offices and in judicial support positions. They have reduced use of retired judges. The salaries of judges and staff have been frozen. In addition, clerks must pay additional operating expenses out of their revolving funds. These changes have required that some judicial branch personnel assume more work. For the most part, court services have not been adversely affected.
The Oklahoma courts have implemented e-citations and are now working diligently on developing a new case management system that will allow all court to adopt e-filing, an electronic document management system and e-payment of fees and fines. They expect that the system will provide greater public access and reduce costs for court users and the public at large.
In FY12, the Oklahoma judiciary will be adopting a number of policy changes and rules changes needed to implement their e-filing system, including the availability of court records to litigants and to the public on-line.
Reports and Articles
Joy Hampton.
"Courts on the Ropes are Losing Budget Battle."
Edmund Sun.com. January 21, 2011.
Barbara Hoberock.
"State Appeals Court Likely to Furlough, Lay Off Staff."
Tulsa World. April 4, 2010.
Gavel to Gavel
Database.
Search the
Gavel to Gavel
legislation database based on state, year, legislation category, or any combination.