Navigating the AI landscape: Best practices for legal professionals
Artificial intelligence is rapidly transforming the legal profession, offering powerful new tools but requiring an understanding of what they do well and what they don't. This webinar from the TRI/NCSC AI Policy Consortium for Law & Courts explores the practical implications of AI for legal practitioners, focusing on how to effectively integrate these technologies into daily workflows while mitigating potential risks. Join our panel of experts as they discuss the critical concepts for safely and responsibly leveraging AI in legal practice.
After attending this webinar, participants will be able to:
- Identify key applications of AI within the legal profession and their potential impact.
- Recognize and understand common pitfalls and limitations of AI.
- Implement practical strategies for the secure and ethical use of AI-powered legal tools.
Moderator:
- Rabihah Butler, manager, Enterprise Content - Risk, Fraud, and Government, Thomson Reuters Institute
Panelists:
- Mark Francis, partner, Holland & Knight
- Ashwini Jarral, strategic advisor, IJIS
- Justice Linda Kevins, Supreme Court, Suffolk County, NY
TRI/NCSC AI Policy Consortium for Law & Courts
An intensive examination of the impact of technologies such as generative AI (GenAI), large language models, and other emerging, and yet-to-be developed tools.
Explore more
Key considerations for the use of GenAI tools in legal practice & courts
Learn foundational best practices for use of GenAI with an emphasis on the rigor of application for these practices being proportional to the intended use and the risk level associated with that use.
Agentic AI in legal settings: Guardrails for responsible innovation
Learn how Agentic AI can transform legal work with governance strategies to manage risks, ensure accountability, and support ethical use in courts and law practices.
AI tools, self-represented litigants & the future of access to justice
Learn how courts and legal aid organizations are addressing critical questions about how self-represented litigants can use AI tools in constructive ways.