The Philippines’ Supreme Court received nearly P15 million from the government of the United States to support its ongoing judicial reform efforts. The U.S. State Department’s Office of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs awarded the grant to the National Center for State Courts to facilitate the implementation of the Manila Justice Sector Reform Program in support of the Supreme Court’s 2022-2027 Strategic Plan for Judicial Innovations.
The National Center for State Courts, creator of The National Judicial Task Force to Examine State Courts’ Response to Mental Illness, said in a report released on Tuesday that judges are in a unique position to steer individuals to pre-established resources that may help them with their mental health issues. The task force was created in March 2020 and is made up of a group of judges, lawyers and community members, including co-chairs Chief Justice Paul Reiber of Vermont and Chief Administrative Judge Lawrence Marks of New York. Over the course of the two years, the task force published almost 100 resources to aid in the implementation of its recommendations.
District Court Judge Thomas Kelly Ryan of Johnson County, Kansas, was awarded the 2022 G. Thomas Munsterman Award for Jury Innovation presented by the National Center for State Courts (NCSC) Oct. 20. Named for the founder and former director of NCSC’s Center for Jury Studies, G. Thomas Munsterman, the award recognizes states, local courts, organizations and individuals that have made significant improvements or innovations in jury procedures, operations and practices. Judge Ryan was honored for his efforts to engage with the public to develop a jury process that would address public health concerns while also protecting constitutional rights and resolving pending cases.
The effective use of plea agreements to ensure justice is administered through a fair, transparent and efficient process, while balancing victims’ rights and the public's interest, was the focus of a week-long training session for prosecutors held at Port of Spain in Trinidad & Tobago beginning Oct. 18. The session was funded by the Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs Caribbean Anti-Crime Program and implemented by the National Center for State Courts. The training was aimed at increasing the usage of plea agreements to resolve cases, which will reduce backlogs, promote timely disposition of cases, and improve the overall administration of justice in Trinidad and Tobago.
The Las Vegas Justice Court has received a $1.25 million grant to improve housing stability through eviction diversion efforts. The funding will go toward establishing an eviction diversion program that will use CARE teams, community partnerships and collaborations to help those at risk of eviction or housing instability. The grant comes from the National Center for State Courts' Eviction Diversion Initiative, via funding from the Wells Fargo Foundation.
This podcast revisits a 2021 National Center for State Courts State of the State Courts survey that found public trust in the courts, along with other institutions, has declined. 64% of survey respondents said they had either a great deal of confidence or some confidence in their state courts.
Making sure that older Americans are of free from abuse, scams, and poor administration of their finances and health isn’t a new pursuit. But as the nation ages, aid from the legal system becomes more critical. Diane Robinson of the Center for Elders and the Courts at the National Center for State Courts (NCSC) discusses alternatives to guardianship.
Bexar County commissioners on Tuesday unanimously approved nearly $35 million in coronavirus pandemic relief grants aimed at mental health care in schools, jail and the county in general. Also approved is a comprehensive, three-year study of domestic violence. About $226,000 in American Rescue Plan Act funding will pay for the first year. The total cost is $750,000. The study, which will be carried out by the National Council of Juvenile and Family Courts as well as the National Center for State Courts, will add to the work that the local Collaborative Commission on Domestic Violence has already started, said Judge Monique Diaz, co-chair of the commission.
The Administrative Office of the Illinois Courts (AOIC) announced that it has been awarded $315,000 from a Bureau of Justice Assistance Justice and Mental Health Collaboration Program (JMHCP) Grant to implement and support sub-recipient pilot programs serving court-involved individuals. The JMHCP supports partnerships to improve the court and community response to individuals with mental health and co-occurring mental health substance-use-related needs through a designated cross-system liaison. The National Center for State Courts will be assisting the AOIC and Task Force in providing technical assistance and program evaluations.
North Dakota State Court Administrator Sally Holewa has received the 2021 Warren E. Burger Award for Excellence in Court Administration from the National Center for State Courts. Holewa was honored with the award September 29 during a virtual presentation from NCSC President Mary C. McQueen. The honor is awarded to individuals who make significant contributions to the field of court administration through management and administration, education and training, or research and consulting.
As the challenges of adjusting to the COVID pandemic ease within state courts, persistent concerns regarding the fairness and equity of these same courts remain. Efforts to address these longer-term issues often have focused on judicial decision-making and legal issues. National Center for State Courts Director of Racial Justice, Equity, and Inclusion Edwin Bell shares how courts are working to improve DEI through newly developed policies and practices.
Experts warn that the focus on a judge, coming amid an uptick in threats to the judiciary in general, is dangerous for the rule of law in the U.S. and the country’s viability as a democracy. Nathan Hall, a principal consultant with the National Center for State Courts, noted that the combination of lagging public trust, coupled with access to judges’ addresses and personal information impacts everyone from nationally known Supreme Court justices to otherwise anonymous state judges.